Butterfly Petr Korbel Pro-Line Table Tennis Racket | The Perfect Combination For All-Round Topspin Play | Pro-Line Series | Recommended For Aspiring Professional Players

The popular Limba wood outer plies are ideal for consistent, aggressive topspin play. With good spin and even better speed, Sriver is an excellent all-around attacking rubber. Sriver was the dominant rubber for more than 25 years. Even today, it is still a great rubber that can do it all!

PRODUCT HIGHLIGHTS

• BLADE: Petr Korbel | Plies: 5-Ply Wood | Reaction: 10.6 | Vibration: 8.2
• HANDLE: Flared - Concave At The Center - The Most Popular Style
• FOREHAND RUBBER: Sriver | Sponge Thickness (mm): 2.1 | Speed: 38 | Spin: 23 | Arc: 23 | Hardness: 38
• BACKHAND RUBBER: Sriver | Sponge Thickness (mm): 2.1 | Speed: 38 | Spin: 23 | Arc: 23 | Hardness: 38
• APPROVAL: International Table Tennis Federation Approved
• All Pro-Line Rackets Come Fully Assembled

IN DEPTH

• BLADE REACTION & VIBRATION PROPERTIES
• RUBBER SPEED, SPIN, ARC, STABILITY & VARIATION PROPERTIES
• RUBBER SPONGE THICKNESS
  
  

PLEASE NOTE: Ultimately, most players find a blade that best suits their own individual and unique style of play and will use that blade for many years. If properly cared for, the blade will last years. However, the rubber will wear out over time and need to be replaced. When that day comes, DO NOT THROW THIS RACKET AWAY! The glue that is used to assemble Butterfly Pro-Line rackets will allow you to easily remove the old rubber. You can have the rubber professionally installed or you can even do it yourself! Replace with the same rubber or upgrade to one that offers more speed, or more spin, or both!

Did You Know?
More World Class Players Trust Butterfly Than Any Other Brand - At the 2019 World Table Tennis Championships, 99.8% of the participants were surveyed regarding their individual blade and rubber usage. Of those surveyed, Butterfly blades were used by 56.6% of the participants while the other 43.4% consisted of 11 different brands. Butterfly rubbers were used by 53.2% of the participants while the other 46.8% consisted of 11 different brands.