Ideal for Close to The Table Two-Winged Attacker | Pro-Line Series | Recommended For World Class Play

The identical racket used by Dimitrij Ovtcharov. Butterfly's enormously popular Arylate/Carbon technology. The power of Carbon meets the vibration reducing properties of Arylate. Dignics 09C has a sticky top-sheet which provides sharp topspin play and offers the most spin of all Butterfly rubbers. Dignics 05 is powered by Spring Sponge X technology and was developed to generate more power, 'hold' the ball longer and to be even more durable than its predecessor, Spring Sponge.
 

• Blade: Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC | 5-Ply Wood + 2 Arylate/Carbon (ALC) | Reaction: 11.7 | Vibration: 10.5
• Handle: Straight - Uniform From Top To Bottom
• Rubber: Dignics 09C | Sponge Thickness (mm): 2.1 | Speed Rating: 13 | Spin Rating: 13 | Hardness: 44
• Rubber: Dignics 05 | Sponge Thickness (mm): 2.1 | Speed Rating: 13.5 | Spin Rating: 12 | Hardness: 40
• International Table Tennis Federation Approved
• All Pro-Line Rackets Come Fully Assembled

PLEASE NOTE: Ultimately, most players find a blade that best suits their own individual and unique style of play and will use that blade for an extended period of time. If properly cared for, the blade will last years. However, the rubber will wear out over time and need to be replaced. When that day comes, DO NOT THROW THIS RACKET AWAY! The glue that is used to assemble Butterfly Pro-Line rackets will allow you to easily remove the old rubber. You can have the rubber professionally installed or you can even do it yourself! Replace with the same rubber or upgrade to one that offers more speed, or more spin, or both!

Did You Know?
More World Class Players Trust Butterfly Than Any Other Brand - At the 2019 World Table Tennis Championships, 99.8% of the participants were surveyed regarding their individual blade and rubber usage. Of those surveyed, Butterfly blades were used by 56.6% of the participants while the other 43.4% consisted of 11 different brands. Butterfly rubbers were used by 53.2% of the participants while the other 46.8% consisted of 11 different brands.